
New English Library, arguably the greatest pulp horror publisher in Britain, unleashed this abortion on the public in '76.
With the by-line, "It's a ghastly giggle", they were targeting silly schoolboys and (perhaps) readers of the American Famous Monsters, a schizophrenic mag that took horror half seriously, even though its editor F.J. Ackerman took it quite seriously.

The tone is set with a claim that "(he) was born with a silver thigh bone in (his) mouth." What a knee-slapper that is.
He then introduced his staff, Gilbert and Mildew. Gilbert, he explained, was a corpse, and Mildew was a black cat.
Are you Rolling On The Floor Laughing (ROTFL), or didn't that happen until the internet?

You heard it right. Vampire Kites.
Yes, those things that flap in the breeze on the end of a long piece of string and end up crashing to the ground.
I may be alone on this, but I've never worried too much about being attacked by a "dangerous" Vampire Kite.
Have you ever been woken in the middle of the night by a Vampire Kite flapping and tapping on your window ? I haven't. And I don't think it's in my future, either.
Vampire Kids I can understand. Creepy. Vampire Kults. Yes. Vampire Korpses. Why not. I may even be able to work up some anxiety over a Vampire Klit. But not a Vampire Kite. No, no, no.
"Please, win a vampire kite today," the ad urged readers, "and save Ghoul from extinction."
Well, Ghoul never did make it to a second issue, so I assume those 100 Vampire Kites are still hovering in some warehouse waiting to scare the shit out of kite-fearing kids of a new generation.

The monstrosity above was meant to inspire creativity?
Fuck me!
Even when I was 14, I thought this stuff was beyond lame.

This crap feature came across like an early stab at the hilarious Weekly World News with the difference being it wasn't funny, amusing, or worth the tree felled for its publication.
To be fair, it was first. Weekly World News hadn't been invented yet.
As Gruesome insisted, the "Ghoul Gazette" was "the only paper by monsters for monsters".
Jesus, save me.

I spent hours just staring at these like a hungry zombie, imagining the horrors loose between the covers.
More than anything, Ghoul was a huge missed opportunity.
At the time, New English Library was THE leading publisher of horror paperbacks. They had an amazing stable of writers including James Herbert, Guy. N. Smith, Errol Lecale, Martin Jensen, Stephen King, R. Chetwynd-Hayes (possibly the uncredited skipper of this venture) and Robert Lory. The cover of Ghoul was swiped from the NEL cover of Lory's Dracula Returns, for Chrissakes.
So why didn't the editors of this mag use the NEL connection to create a mag featuring interviews with NEL authors and artists? That would have encouraged sales, cross-promoted, and provided readers with incredible access to authors.
Why in God's name didn't they follow in the footsteps of another NEL publication, Science Fiction Monthly, a successful, tabloid-sized mag that fully exploited their stable of science fiction authors and artists?
Who knows why they totally underestimated their readers? Believe me, most NEL horror readers were not morons who ran screaming from Vampire Kites or beat off to "Preymates (give me a fuckin break!) of the Month".
I was an addicted NEL reader, and I thought Ghoul sucked elephant dicks.
Well, mostly sucked.



How it ended up being included is, I'm sure, a tale of mystery and imagination.
Despite this, I have to say it, and say it loud: GHOUL, YOU'RE A DAMN FOOL!
0 Yorumlar